Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog

Followers of this weblog, and readers of my first book (“A Practical Guide to Permitted Changes of Use”) will be aware of my appreciable curiosity on this subject. An appropriately worded situation in a planning permission can preclude the operation of the final Permitted Development Order. But difficulties have arisen where the wording of an allegedly preclusive situation does not refer expressly to the GPDO and/or to section 55(2)(f) and the UCO. ] EWHC 534 (Admin), in which judgment was handed down on 11 March last yr. I won’t repeat what I wrote there, however readers could wish to refresh their memory by looking at that weblog publish. In distinction to this, Article 3(1) of the GPDO grants planning permission for the Classes of development described as permitted growth in Schedule 2 to the Order. This is a vital distinction. Contrary to the position underneath part 55(2)(f), improvement is concerned here.

These are modifications of use for which planning permission is required, and it is the GPDO that grants that permission. It is comprehensible that a preclusive situation want not necessarily refer expressly to part 55(2) (f) or to Article 3(1) of the UCO. However, I am sorry to say that today’s resolution by the Court of Appeal in Dunnett Investments Ltd. ] EWCA Civ 192 has gone the opposite method, and the first instance judgment in that case has been upheld. “Looking first on the phrases used, I do not consider the development of the condition both difficult or unclear. In his view, the interpretation he favoured didn't require the reading in, or studying out, of any phrases. Secretary of State. The condition would thus haven't any discernible purpose. It's a tenet of development, falling inside the umbrella of “sensible” interpretation as championed in Trump International, that it will need to have been the intention that a situation has some content and function. In context, this situation couldn't sensibly have been merely emphatic, which is all it could be if Mr Katkowski’s submission were right. ] to exercise proper management over the event and since the positioning is in an area where new industrial improvement wouldn't normally be permitted”. The 1982 use was highly restricted, and the explanation defined why a very narrow industrial use was being permitted. For all those causes, Hickinbottom LJ was fairly satisfied that the condition did properly exclude the operation of the GPDO; and that Patterson J was correct to reject the appellant’s argument to the opposite. Patten LJ agreed, and the attraction was accordingly dismissed.

The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation and to change Attachment 08 - Standard Agreement Example in entirety. This addendum extends the deadline to submit proposals to January 8, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Activites and Dates table to delay each by one month . The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation. Deadline for Written Questions: August 25, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: November 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The aim of this addendum is to make the revisions to the GFO-17-302 software guide and the GFO-17-302 Questions and Answers (Q&A) to make clear when CEQA documentation needs to be submitted to the Energy Commission. Deadline for Written Questions: September 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Proposals: October 23, November 17 December 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The aim of this addendum is to right the time listed in the solicitation for the deadline to submit proposals in the key Dates and Activities table on page thirteen of the solicitation. The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the key Dates and Activities table on page 13 of the Solicitation Manual.

The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual. Added language appears in bold underlined and deleted language seems in strikethrough. Deadline for Written Questions: August 11, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 20 November 3, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Corrects Pre-Application workshop meeting number in the applying Manual (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to revise the deadline to submit purposes (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual and Budget Form. Purpose of this addendum is to make corrections to the Solicitation Budget Forms. Deadline for Written Questions: July 19, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Makes revisions to the solicitation manual and Attachment 1 - Application Form (See Solicitation Files). Makes revisions to the solicitation manual and Attachment 8, and removes Attachment 13 (See Solicitation Files). Deadline for Written Questions: April 18, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: June 20, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline for Written Questions: December 9, 2016, 5:00 p.m.

how do you write a grant proposal