Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog

Followers of this blog, and readers of my first ebook (“A Practical Guide to Permitted Changes of Use”) will bear in mind of my appreciable interest on this matter. An appropriately worded situation in a planning permission can preclude the operation of the final Permitted Development Order. But difficulties have arisen the place the wording of an allegedly preclusive situation does not refer expressly to the GPDO and/or to part 55(2)(f) and the UCO. ] EWHC 534 (Admin), wherein judgment was handed down on 11 March final 12 months. I won’t repeat what I wrote there, however readers may wish to refresh their memory by taking a look at that weblog post. In contrast to this, Article 3(1) of the GPDO grants planning permission for the Classes of improvement described as permitted development in Schedule 2 to the Order. This is an important distinction. Contrary to the position underneath section 55(2)(f), improvement is involved here.

These are adjustments of use for which planning permission is required, and it is the GPDO that grants that permission. It's comprehensible that a preclusive condition want not necessarily refer expressly to part 55(2) (f) or to Article 3(1) of the UCO. However, I'm sorry to say that today’s resolution by the Court of Appeal in Dunnett Investments Ltd. ] EWCA Civ 192 has gone the opposite method, and the first occasion judgment in that case has been upheld. “Looking first on the phrases used, I do not consider the development of the condition either tough or unclear. In his view, the interpretation he favoured did not require the reading in, or reading out, of any phrases. Secretary of State. The condition would thus don't have any discernible goal. It's a tenet of building, falling inside the umbrella of “sensible” interpretation as championed in Trump International, that it will need to have been the intention that a situation has some content and goal. In context, this situation could not sensibly have been merely emphatic, which is all it would be if Mr Katkowski’s submission had been appropriate. ] to train correct control over the event and because the site is in an space the place new industrial growth wouldn't usually be permitted”. The 1982 use was extremely restricted, and the explanation explained why a very narrow industrial use was being permitted. For all these reasons, Hickinbottom LJ was fairly satisfied that the condition did correctly exclude the operation of the GPDO; and that Patterson J was correct to reject the appellant’s argument to the opposite. Patten LJ agreed, and the attraction was accordingly dismissed.

The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation and to replace Attachment 08 - Standard Agreement Example in entirety. This addendum extends the deadline to submit proposals to January 8, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Activites and Dates table to delay each by one month . The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation. Deadline for Written Questions: August 25, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: November 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The purpose of this addendum is to make the revisions to the GFO-17-302 application manual and the GFO-17-302 Questions and Answers (Q&A) to make clear when CEQA documentation should be submitted to the Energy Commission. Deadline for Written Questions: September 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Proposals: October 23, November 17 December 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The aim of this addendum is to correct the time listed within the solicitation for the deadline to submit proposals in the important thing Dates and Activities table on page thirteen of the solicitation. The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the key Dates and Activities table on web page 13 of the Solicitation Manual.

The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual. Added language appears in bold underlined and deleted language appears in strikethrough. Deadline for Written Questions: August 11, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 20 November 3, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Corrects Pre-Application workshop assembly number in the appliance Manual (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to revise the deadline to submit applications (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual and Budget Form. Purpose of this addendum is to make corrections to the Solicitation Budget Forms. Deadline for Written Questions: July 19, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Makes revisions to the solicitation guide and Attachment 1 - Application Form (See Solicitation Files). Makes revisions to the solicitation guide and Attachment 8, and removes Attachment 13 (See Solicitation Files). Deadline for Written Questions: April 18, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: June 20, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline for Written Questions: December 9, 2016, 5:00 p.m.

example of grant proposal for non profit organization