Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog

Followers of this weblog, and readers of my first guide (“A Practical Guide to Permitted Changes of Use”) will bear in mind of my considerable curiosity in this topic. An appropriately worded situation in a planning permission can preclude the operation of the final Permitted Development Order. But difficulties have arisen the place the wording of an allegedly preclusive situation does not refer expressly to the GPDO and/or to section 55(2)(f) and the UCO. ] EWHC 534 (Admin), during which judgment was handed down on eleven March last yr. I won’t repeat what I wrote there, but readers could wish to refresh their reminiscence by looking at that blog publish. In contrast to this, Article 3(1) of the GPDO grants planning permission for the Classes of growth described as permitted growth in Schedule 2 to the Order. This is a crucial distinction. Contrary to the place beneath section 55(2)(f), growth is involved right here.

These are adjustments of use for which planning permission is required, and it is the GPDO that grants that permission. It is comprehensible that a preclusive condition need not necessarily refer expressly to part 55(2) (f) or to Article 3(1) of the UCO. However, I am sorry to say that today’s resolution by the Court of Appeal in Dunnett Investments Ltd. ] EWCA Civ 192 has gone the opposite method, and the first occasion judgment in that case has been upheld. “Looking first at the words used, I don't consider the construction of the condition both difficult or unclear. In his view, the interpretation he favoured didn't require the reading in, or reading out, of any phrases. Secretary of State. The condition would thus haven't any discernible goal. It is a tenet of development, falling within the umbrella of “sensible” interpretation as championed in Trump International, that it must have been the intention that a condition has some content material and objective. In context, this situation could not sensibly have been merely emphatic, which is all it would be if Mr Katkowski’s submission were correct. ] to exercise correct management over the development and because the location is in an area where new industrial growth wouldn't usually be permitted”. The 1982 use was extremely restricted, and the reason explained why a really slim industrial use was being permitted. For all these causes, Hickinbottom LJ was quite glad that the condition did correctly exclude the operation of the GPDO; and that Patterson J was right to reject the appellant’s argument to the contrary. Patten LJ agreed, and the enchantment was accordingly dismissed.

The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation and to exchange Attachment 08 - Standard Agreement Example in entirety. This addendum extends the deadline to submit proposals to January 8, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Activites and Dates table to delay each by one month . The aim of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation. Deadline for Written Questions: August 25, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: November 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The purpose of this addendum is to make the revisions to the GFO-17-302 software guide and the GFO-17-302 Questions and Answers (Q&A) to clarify when CEQA documentation ought to be submitted to the Energy Commission. Deadline for Written Questions: September 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Proposals: October 23, November 17 December 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The purpose of this addendum is to right the time listed within the solicitation for the deadline to submit proposals in the important thing Dates and Activities table on page 13 of the solicitation. The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the key Dates and Activities desk on page 13 of the Solicitation Manual.

The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual. Added language appears in daring underlined and deleted language seems in strikethrough. Deadline for Written Questions: August 11, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 20 November 3, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Corrects Pre-Application workshop meeting number in the appliance Manual (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to revise the deadline to submit purposes (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual and Budget Form. Purpose of this addendum is to make corrections to the Solicitation Budget Forms. Deadline for Written Questions: July 19, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Makes revisions to the solicitation guide and Attachment 1 - Application Form (See Solicitation Files). Makes revisions to the solicitation manual and Attachment 8, and removes Attachment 13 (See Solicitation Files). Deadline for Written Questions: April 18, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: June 20, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline for Written Questions: December 9, 2016, 5:00 p.m.

how to write a successful grant proposal