Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog

Followers of this blog, and readers of my first book (“A Practical Guide to Permitted Changes of Use”) will remember of my considerable curiosity in this topic. An appropriately worded situation in a planning permission can preclude the operation of the general Permitted Development Order. But difficulties have arisen where the wording of an allegedly preclusive condition doesn't refer expressly to the GPDO and/or to section 55(2)(f) and the UCO. ] EWHC 534 (Admin), by which judgment was handed down on eleven March last year. I won’t repeat what I wrote there, however readers might want to refresh their memory by taking a look at that weblog post. In distinction to this, Article 3(1) of the GPDO grants planning permission for the Classes of improvement described as permitted growth in Schedule 2 to the Order. This is a vital distinction. Contrary to the place underneath section 55(2)(f), growth is concerned here.

These are changes of use for which planning permission is required, and it's the GPDO that grants that permission. It's comprehensible that a preclusive condition need not necessarily refer expressly to part 55(2) (f) or to Article 3(1) of the UCO. However, I am sorry to say that today’s choice by the Court of Appeal in Dunnett Investments Ltd. ] EWCA Civ 192 has gone the other manner, and the primary occasion judgment in that case has been upheld. “Looking first on the words used, I don't consider the development of the condition either troublesome or unclear. In his view, the interpretation he favoured didn't require the reading in, or studying out, of any phrases. Secretary of State. The situation would thus haven't any discernible goal. It's a tenet of construction, falling within the umbrella of “sensible” interpretation as championed in Trump International, that it will need to have been the intention that a situation has some content material and function. In context, this condition couldn't sensibly have been merely emphatic, which is all it can be if Mr Katkowski’s submission had been right. ] to train correct control over the development and since the site is in an area the place new industrial development wouldn't normally be permitted”. The 1982 use was highly restricted, and the reason defined why a really narrow industrial use was being permitted. For all those causes, Hickinbottom LJ was quite glad that the condition did properly exclude the operation of the GPDO; and that Patterson J was right to reject the appellant’s argument to the contrary. Patten LJ agreed, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.

The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation and to exchange Attachment 08 - Standard Agreement Example in entirety. This addendum extends the deadline to submit proposals to January 8, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Activites and Dates desk to delay each by one month . The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the solicitation. Deadline for Written Questions: August 25, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: November 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The aim of this addendum is to make the revisions to the GFO-17-302 software guide and the GFO-17-302 Questions and Answers (Q&A) to make clear when CEQA documentation needs to be submitted to the Energy Commission. Deadline for Written Questions: September 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Proposals: October 23, November 17 December 8, 2017, 5:00 p.m. The aim of this addendum is to appropriate the time listed within the solicitation for the deadline to submit proposals in the key Dates and Activities desk on web page thirteen of the solicitation. The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the key Dates and Activities desk on web page thirteen of the Solicitation Manual.

The purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual. Added language appears in bold underlined and deleted language seems in strikethrough. Deadline for Written Questions: August 11, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 20 November 3, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Corrects Pre-Application workshop assembly number in the application Manual (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to revise the deadline to submit functions (See Solicitation Files). Purpose of this addendum is to make revisions to the Solicitation Manual and Budget Form. Purpose of this addendum is to make corrections to the Solicitation Budget Forms. Deadline for Written Questions: July 19, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: October 9, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Makes revisions to the solicitation guide and Attachment 1 - Application Form (See Solicitation Files). Makes revisions to the solicitation manual and Attachment 8, and removes Attachment thirteen (See Solicitation Files). Deadline for Written Questions: April 18, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline to Submit Applications: June 20, 2017, 5:00 p.m. Deadline for Written Questions: December 9, 2016, 5:00 p.m.

how to write a grant proposal for a small business